On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 02:38:28PM -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > that's true. > > I am also have a bug reported for nx package waiting for a long time. There are new nx packages in updates-testing since a week now. Which bug are you referring to? > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Ricky Zhou<ricky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, as per the process at > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers, > > does anybody know how to contact Axel Thimm? I know. > > We've been pinging him at > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484855 for over two weeks > > now, although the bug has sat there for much longer already. It's correct that the bug is open a while, but technically your first ping as on 2009-06-05 00:05:35 EDT, that's hardly two weeks. I was waiting for 1.15.0 (out three days ago) to check whether the patch is still neccessary. But it looks like it still is. Anyway there will be an upgrade and I'll try to fix the issue en passant. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpc0ZyRyhVYV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
