On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 17:17:07 -0400,I was watching them for a while to see if was something I wanted to try
Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> we've been left in a position of maintaining it and we've added some
> real features that have been needed along the way as grub 2's progress
> has been slow at best and some of the design decisions early on were a
and after the project went several months with no apparent commits, I
figured this was something I probably didn't want to play with.
Depending on grub2 to have active development seems a bit risky to me.
But, GRUB 2 development doesn't look inactive. There is a lot of discussion going on in the grub-devel mailing list [1], and their revision log in their GIT mirror (primary development is in SVN) has lots of commits listed in at least the last year for grub2 trunk[2].
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/
[2] http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2.git?a=log
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
