Re: GRUB 2 in Ubuntu 9.10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:41 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:

> If that's the case then it obviously makes sense to stick with grub 
> "legacy" but given it's status who is going to be upstream for this? What I 
> fear is a similar situation like we had with rpm where nobody really took 
> ownership and vendors carried their own individual patches wich doesn't 
> really work well with fedoras "stay close to upstream" mantra.

For better or worse, we are effectively running a grub fork, and I see
very little desire to change that...

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux