On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:41 +0200, Dennis J. wrote: > If that's the case then it obviously makes sense to stick with grub > "legacy" but given it's status who is going to be upstream for this? What I > fear is a similar situation like we had with rpm where nobody really took > ownership and vendors carried their own individual patches wich doesn't > really work well with fedoras "stay close to upstream" mantra. For better or worse, we are effectively running a grub fork, and I see very little desire to change that... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
