On 06/08/2009 03:15 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > Ah, so it is. Thanks! So now my only hurdle is the missing popt-devel > - any ideas? > That one looks like a genuine packaging bug. We don't use rpm-devel on the builders so no one saw it. The header files for popt are in the main popt package in RHEL5/CentOS5 so that's what actually needs to be required in this instance, not popt-devel. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
