On Wednesday 14 July 2004 03:42 am, David Nielsen wrote: > Even when disregarding the implications that using this would have on > the size of the base install, doesn't konqy still have problems with > some CSS stuff, and other details. > You should check back on Konqueror. If you've been out of the loop over 6 months on it, you've missed a lot. KHTML is in Safari, Apple's browser. They've contributed a lot in the last few months, and I daresay that KHTML is comparable to Mozilla nowadays. Its reputation has yet to catch up. -- Jonathan Gardner jgardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
