On 03.06.2009 23:02, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On 06/03/2009 04:55 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 04:24:16PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>> Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >>>> The answers are quite interesting and as far as I can see can be quite >>>> helpful to decide whom to (not) vote for. So if you plan to vote in the >>>> elections I'd suggest you go and read the answers! >>> Thanks for doing this! >> >> Agreed, thanks. >> >> I'd like to add that if anyone want's follow ups to answers, feel free to >> email the candidates too! > > A great big me too here. Also, if anyone isn't able to attend the > townhall meetings, I'd be happy to answer any questions sent to me via > email. I don't want to discourage that at all, but would like to make a general remark -- partly as a reminder for the next elections. One thing I really liked about the whole candidate questionnaire: The answers came in as private mails and went public in (nearly) one go. That way those nominees that were late with sending in answers had no chance to look at the answers from the other candidates ;-) CU knurd -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
