On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:50:40PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 09:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > So I think the gnome-scan interface is nice but if my results are > > reproduced by others, we can't really replace xsane with it until it's a > > bit less buggy. It would be nice if any coders with scanning interest > > could contribute to the code I guess (I'm unfortunately not a coder). > > IMO the obnoxious license dialog that xsane still subjects you to is > sufficient reason already to replace it. We don't tolerate dialogs like > that in other default-installed components... Why don't we patch it out then.... Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
