Re: Maintainer Responsibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 08:54 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Conrad Meyer wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 June 2009 11:40:42 pm Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> Conrad Meyer wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 03 June 2009 10:23:05 pm Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>>> Let me try an analogy: How do you handle defects/malfunctions with your
> >>>> car?
> >>> Did a bunch of hobbyists from around the world build your car by
> >>> communicating over the internet?
> >> Have you ever seen an open source car?
> >>
> >> The Fedora "car" manufacturer is the "fedora community", assembling it
> >> from "upstream" components.
> >>
> >> Ralf
> > 
> > That's the idea, opensource behaves completely different from a car 
> > manufacturer.
> Wrong. It doesn't.

I don't think we have the power to (nor would we want to) force upstream
to do certain things in a certain way, for ridiculously low prices and
"no we won't pay you on delivery" but 3 months later. The relationship
between us and upstream is significantly different from a car
manufacturer and its suppliers.

Nils
-- 
Nils Philippsen      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase 
Red Hat               a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils@xxxxxxxxxx       nor Safety."  --  Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint:      C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux