On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 22:57 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Steve Grubb wrote: > > And then should the bug be closed hoping that one day you pull in a > > package that solves the user's problem? > > If the bug is fixed upstream, the Fedora report can be reopened with a > request to backport the fix (but that should only be done if it's important > enough that it cannot wait for the next bugfix update getting pushed > anyway). > > Until then, why do we need to have the bug open in 2 places? There's an obvious answer to this question: we track the importance of issues to Fedora via the Fedora bug tracker, not via upstream bug trackers. There's no way I can mark a bug in the KDE bug tracker as blocking the release of Fedora 12. (longer email on the whole thread coming.) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
