Steve Grubb wrote:
I don't want to start a long thread, but just to ask a couple questions for my
own clarification. Does a maintainer's responsibilities end with packaging
bugs? IOW, if there is a problem in the package that is _broken code_ do they
need to do something about it or is it acceptable for them to close the bug
and say talk to upstream? Do we want those bugs open to track when the bug is
fixed in the distro? I'll accept whatever the answer is, I'm just curious.
As far as:
"Do we want those bugs open to track when the bug is fixed in the distro?"
I would think the answer is "yes". Also tie the bug to the upstream bug
if possible; if not, record in Fedora BZ a link to where the bug was
reported (e.g. if upstream has only a mailing list).
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
Congratulations! You've won a free trip to the future! All you have to
do to claim your prize is wait five minutes...
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
