Re: Why not to create Fedora-us and Fedora-non-us branches?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/31/2009 05:48 PM, Alexey Torkhov wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 17:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 05/31/2009 05:24 PM, Alexey Torkhov wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 16:58 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Usage of trademark was granted to Russian Fedora by agreement between
>>> Red Hat and other company that represent it here, AFAIK.
>>> Max Spevack was on presentation on Russian Fedora launch.
>>
>> I don't see it recorded in
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Trademark_licensees
>>
>> It doesn't fit the trademark guidelines either. While Red Hat can
>> legally grant a license to anyone and doesn't have to abide by the
>> guidelines, I would expect it to do so nevertheless. So why a special
>> exception for "Russian Fedora"?
> 
> I don't know the details of an agreement, ask legal team for that.

I don't need to know the details of the agreement. If any such agreement
exists, it should follow the trademark guidelines that Fedora set for
rest of the community and not be given special exceptions. Can the
Fedora Board look into this?

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux