Re: gnaughty is a hot babe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:11 PM, sankarshan <> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Rahul Sundaram
> <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> My packaging survey turned up a interesting suggestion
>>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-May/msg01809.html
>>
>> We don't currently have any guidelines covering this but considering the
>> Debian action to hot babe
>>
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/113644/
>>
>> I wanted to asked first,  is this allowed in Fedora?
>
> Given the direction of the thread, do you expect a resolution to come
> up from the discussion ?


Sometimes, it's worth to discuss it. For example alliance was refused
on debian, but approved on fedora.

Chitlesh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux