On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh.goorah@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Kushal Das wrote: >> Yes that is true , but it does not provide any support to view that >> content, we have many other packages in Fedora which allows to >> download content and they download whatever format the site is >> providing, how the users watch it, it depends on their choice. > > No, it doesn't (not till it is approved) not depend on the user's > choice. My package OVM was blocked by FESCo because there was no > opensource simulator. So if the downloaded videos aren't under an > opensource compatible format, FESCo must rule out its package review. Sorry but this is just bullshit with this logic we should ban everything which can download files. In case of OVM you wanted to add the "unviewable" content into fedora, while this packages do not add the movies to fedora they just provide a way to download them. Nobody is proposing to add a mp3 file or a h264 encoded video to fedora, so you are comparing apples and oranges. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
