On 05/27/2009 01:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 15:07 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
I can't wait to see how we depsolve through:
yum update:
- foo is updated and recommends bar
- bar conflicts with baz which is also in the update
but I'm sure we'll muddle through - provided this is included in upstream
rpm.
seems obvious to me that, in that case, bar should simply not be
installed (possibly yum could print a note of what happened).
That may be obvious but I think it makes a lot more work. Instead of
simply having a possible dependency where the suggestion is either used
or not depending on a config file option, you have a dependency that
must be kept separate from the normal dependencies so that you know you
can get rid of it (and it's dependencies) if a conflict arises.
-Toshio
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
