Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > I think the number of disputing perspectives in this thread ALONE on how
> > suggests would be handles proves that it is not obvious on its face how
> > suggests should be handled.
> 
> Well, people are proposing 2 behaviors: 1. treat as hard dependencies by
> default or 2. ignore by default. Why not have both?

No, there are also the "ask the user always" proponents.
Of course... they're wrong. :)

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux