Am Samstag, den 23.05.2009, 09:52 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:35:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > >Also I've got a notion that FESCo recently approves more and more > >proposals without asking the community for opinions first and even in > >opposition to the community. > > I can't recall that being the case. There certainly may have been some > proposals that were opened during the week that were discussed on that Friday, > but we aren't creating secret proposals and voting on them. All of them come > directly from contributors (usually via fedora-devel discussions) and are > logged in the open fesco trac instance for the meetings. When the flags proposal was announced to fedora-devel, so so a public decision-making could take place *before* making a policy? The proposal was not announced, it's ratification nether and the policy was active for months without anybody getting informed. This is what I'd call a secret. > > > >> > 3. If someone really needs docs, he will realize this himself, > >> > because he is missing knowledge. For flags he doesn't. How is a > >> > deluge user supposed the realize the lack of a function? > >> > >> Deluge is clearly spelled out in the guideline as not needing flags for > >> functionality. Is that statement incorrect? > > > >Please note the difference between "a function" and "functionality". Of > >course the missing flags do not impact the basic function of deluge > >which is sharing files, but there is certain functionality missing. > >People can no longer see the location of their peers on a quick glance > >and have to read instead. > > > I don't find that concerning. Maybe it will help literacy. Hopefully, but the original question is still unanswered then: How is a deluge user supposed the realize the lack of single a function? > josh Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
