Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:24:35 -0500
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KNode/0.10.9

Rahul Sundaram wrote:

>  Why isn't CMUCL available for 64-bit systems?

Simply not supported (or bootstrapped) there.

-- Rex



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Packaging Survey - May 2009
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
  - From: Jerry James
- Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
  - From: Rahul Sundaram

Prev by Date: The future of firestarter
Next by Date: Re: The future of firestarter
Previous by thread: Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
Next by thread: Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux