On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 09:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 15:09 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote: > > Maybe packageKit pointing out / highlighting package that have > > subpackage (such as -docs or -flags) might help this advertisement. > > There is an Online Docs group that has the -docs subpackage for many of > the system-config-* packages. It uses conditionals which are painful, > but would be a way for more -docs subpackages to be visible, and if the > user wishes to have local documentation, if available, for the packages > they've chosen, they can pick that group. > > The group name is a bit... wrong, but maybe a group of people that care > about documentation could help come up with a better name, and help to > ensure that all the available -docs packages get listed in this group. Sorry for chiming in late, but I'm just catching up with email after being on vacation. This particular group was my brain-fart, I just wanted to have a way to easily include/exclude online help documentation (mostly to make it easy for people doing live media to leave it out). Feel free to rename if you have a more suitable idea, though. If there is another means to achieve the same purpose, I'm all ears as well. Nils -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nils@xxxxxxxxxx nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
