Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx) said: > Yet another insecure temporary file vulnerability. Why do we still not > polyinstantiate /tmp by default? We're wasting lots of time on security > measures which keep breaking apps such as SELinux, but simple things like > polyinstantiation are still not used, why? This code would be perfectly > safe if polyinstantiation was mandatory. Why are we stuck in the 1970s? ... send patches? It's techncially feasible, but no one's done the legwork to integrate it fully yet. (xguest goes a bit beyond what we'd want by default.) Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
