On Wed, 20 May 2009 10:05:38 -0400 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > (really, this will affect only a small number of packagers, > > > anyway.) > > > > I think you (and others) are significantly underestimating the > > number of affected packages. The previous unwritten policy (from > > RHL times) not to ship any flags wasn't enforced for > > community-maintained packages, several packages include flags and > > some (e.g. freeciv) need them for proper operation. > > All you've mentioned are the same packages I already know about: > > - kdebase (or some similar package in KDE) > - gcompris > - freeciv - xfce4-xkb-plugin is another one. > If there's really a lot of packages, I'd like actual data as to what > they are; vague descriptions of 'several' doesn't really help frame > the discussion of the amount of work. Totally agreed. > Bill kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
