On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 18:21 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > Wouldn't it be better if we apply this policy only to those packages > that contain "unsafe" flags? I mean, if the tarball contains an > "unsafe" flag, make a flags subpackage with all the flags. On the > other hand, if all the flags in the tarball are "safe" as in my above > example, I don't see the rationale for spending the time and the > effort of creating a subpackage. That's not a terrible stance to take, until you have a package that contains all the flags except for say Tibet. Plus you then have to try and keep a running list of "unsafe" flags, and make sure the package set is kept up to date with those unsafe removals. In my experience, such efforts fail. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
