Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 14:23 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I agree with this sentiment 100%.  We're here to make better packages, 
> not whine about how making better packages is hard.  However, I'd point 
> out that in this specifc case Jesse raised the "easier" argument and 
> Till was just replying to that.

I think that my point was that it is an easier to understand policy.  It
may be more difficult to enact, but it is a far sight easier than trying
to figure out what other packages might require your flags, and if any
of those packages are on something called a "default spin", which can
change it's contents at any time.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux