Re: Problem with build-id and cycling the free pascal compiler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Op dinsdag 19-05-2009 om 13:34 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Roland
McGrath:
> > I've placed a new file with the same name with unstripped-binaries. I
> > just tried to make a simple example, but didn't realize that the
> > compiled would add '-s' to the link-script when no debug-information is
> > specified. (The script is generated by the compiler)
> 
> Btw, note that "--build-id=md5" is not what you want to be using.
> What gcc passes is just "--build-id", which defaults to "--build-id=sha1".
> fpc should use plain "--build-id" too.

It does. I was just testing different types.

> The fact that the input files don't contain any debug info rules out the
> kinds of problems I was expecting it would be.  This just looks like a new
> ld bug (a regression since F10).
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501582

Thanks for the help. I hope that someone can fix this.

Joost

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux