Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 19:32 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On the other hand, KDE upstream explicitly decided NOT to ban flags,
> as they consider banning flags to be a political move and to go
> against KDE's principle of political neutrality. 

Consider the following statement:
	On the other hand, $PROJECT upstream explicitly decided NOT to
	ban profanity, as they consider banning profanity to be a
	political move and to go against $PROJECT's principle of
	political neutrality.

Would people be arguing to ship that project, unmodified, in Fedora?

Try the same statement with s/profanity/sexually explicit images/.
Or anything that offends some people irrationally.

Besides, the KDE position doesn't make any sense -- you either ship (for
example) a Taiwanese flag, or you don't. Either way, you've thrown your
opinion into the ring. Only by _avoiding_ flags altogether do you get to
avoid participating in the political debate, and remain neutral.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux