On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ok, just so I make sure I understand your argument completely. "It's > fine to include a pre-release copy of Thunderbird and Firefox because > you can bludgeon unsupported extensions into being supported by > following an undocumented and potentially dangerous hack." > > Seriously, people. This is exactly the sort of elitist bullshit that > puts people off of using Fedora. Furthermore, it's damned hypocritical. [snip] This isn't a pre-release / release issue. Extensions will lag the formal release by months. This is a long-standing problem for our upstream there. Mozilla has been doing some aggressive work trying to get extensions updated ahead of the release which is why any work now at all. The ones who have not yet updated for 3.5 will very likely still not be upgraded by the time of the formal release. And, yes… The RC is pending: http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.firefox/browse_thread/thread/9b34f6991d125306/56495ed84714afd9?lnk=raot#56495ed84714afd9 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
