Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Denis Leroy wrote:
> On 05/18/2009 07:32 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > And FYI, the current policy doesn't ban flags entirely, but they have to
> > be in a -flags package which is not installed by default
>
> That's about the same as banning them. What percentage of users do you
> think will install them, let alone be aware they exist ?

It wouldn't be so bad if a package could suggest another package without 
requiring it, so that Yum or PackageKit could tell the user "There is also a 
kdebase-runtime-flags package that you can install if you like".

Björn Persson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux