David Woodhouse píše v Ne 10. 05. 2009 v 00:20 +0100: > On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 13:24 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote: > > FESCo conducted a brief discussion of moving PowerPC to a secondary > > architecture for Fedora 12. The general consensus is that since > > Fedora 12 development cycle has already begun, it is not appropriate > > for Fedora 12. However, for Fedora 13, FESCo is in favor of the idea. > > NB: THIS IS NOT AN OFFICIAL VOTE OR POSISTION, THAT WILL COME NEXT > > WEEK. > > It was originally decreed by the Board that we wouldn't drop PowerPC > from being a primary architecture until some other architecture has > actually shown that the infrastructure for secondary architectures is > working. > > We still don't have any secondary architectures gearing up to ship > Fedora 11 -- it would be really interesting to know why that is. > > What technical barriers are still there -- why don't we have a release > yet? > > I think that at this point it's acceptable to leave the fate of the port > to the people who most care about it -- but if there are infrastructure > or other problems which would block a release _regardless_ of how hard > the port maintainers work, that's less reasonable. > > So a report from our existing secondary architecture teams on why they > haven't managed to release yet would be useful input to next week's > meeting. Short info about s390x status - it was restarted earlier this year with the goal to have F-11 release - still building F-11 packages - 5620 successful builds (--latest), ~360 ExcludeArchs, ~750 failures with the Java stack being the main hurdle - we have some issues with capacity of the network connection to the koji hub and it also limits our progress - only a bunch of packages exist now on the koji hub, but we should start doing composes soon(TM) Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
