Mike McGrath wrote: > K, so we have a "might miss functionality". I think we can be more > specific then that. I'm not trying to be annoying about this, more > realistic about the changes that have been proposed actually getting in > place. It's going to have to be a _real_ good reason for the types of > code changes you guys are talking about which is essentially: in glibc: /* Support for utimensat syscall was added in 2.6.22, on alpha and s390 only after 2.6.22-rc1. */ /* Support for private futexes was added in 2.6.22. */ /* Support for fallocate was added in 2.6.23, on s390 only after 2.6.23-rc1. */ /* Support for various CLOEXEC and NONBLOCK flags was added for x86, x86-64, PPC, IA-64, SPARC< and S390 in 2.6.23. */ /* Support for ADJ_OFFSET_SS_READ was added in 2.6.24. */ /* Support for various CLOEXEC and NONBLOCK flags was added for x86, x86-64, PPC, IA-64, and SPARC in 2.6.27. */ /* Support for the accept4 syscall was added in 2.6.28. */ /* Support for the FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME flag was added in 2.6.29. */ /* Support for the AT_RANDOM auxiliary vector entry was added in 2.6.29. */ /* Support for preadv and pwritev was added in 2.6.30. */ > "Change koji/mock to create virtual machines on demand" [1] > > "change our non-xen builders to become xen" > > "Build differently x86/x86_64 then all of the other archs" You can try first x86 and x86_64. PPC can wait a bit. > "test test test" > > I'm not even sure this is a realistic F12 or F13 request as far a timing > goes. > > -Mike > > [1] This is epic btw. what a shame! fedora should be autohosted from day ONE! -thanks- regards, -- Polycommander, Erkowit, Urquiola, Andros Patria, Cason, Aegean Sea, Prestige, ... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
