Re: Breaking deps deliberately

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:18:07AM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > However you're going to have to help me out here, because I can't find
> > any FESCo "policy pages" except for one about elections and other
> > about package maintainers.  I'm quite probably looking in entirely the
> 
> I'll admit (and take the blame for the fact) that FESCo has been
> particularly bad in the past about writing down policy that we've
> enacted (which is not much).  For example, I need to write a new page
> on how to rename a package.  But the "no broken deps" rule already
> exists in the release criteria[1].  If perhaps a link to them from
> somewhere else on the wiki is appropriate, that doesn't cost us
> anything obviously, though I'd be most interested in where you'd like
> to see it linked from.
> 
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/ReleaseCriteria#Package_Sanity

I think surely from the packaging guidelines, because (speaking for
myself anyway), that's the place I go to to find out how packages
should be made.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux