Re: Breaking deps deliberately

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:47:03AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2009 23:08:39 +0100, Richard wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 03:27:42PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Someone could easily do the same thing in future.  If broken
> > > dependencies are so unacceptable, then it should be added to the
> > > packaging guidelines.
> > 
> > I added this as an agenda item for the FESCo meeting:
> > 
> > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/147
> >   "Meeting agenda item: No broken dependencies should be a packaging guideline"
> > 
> 
> Am I reading your EPEL 5 libguestfs package changelog right? You've
> created the same broken dep also for EPEL 5. And in response to this thread
> you have released malfunctioning software instead?

It now fails at runtime with an error message saying that vmchannel is
not supported by that version of qemu.

There's also an open bug to get the relevant bits backported into
RHEL 5.4:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497625

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 75 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux