On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:30:59 -0600 Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Adam Williamson > <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, everyone - just a quick note that, last week, I revised / > > expanded the bug lifecycle page: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow > > I have two questions about situations outside the realm of bug triage. > Both involve package reviews. > > 1. Suppose I submit a package for review, and then later decide that I > want to withdraw the submission for some reason. (I had this happen > recently when legal problems with the package came to light.) The > review bug should go to state CLOSED, but with what reason? WONTFIX? Yes. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process > 2. Suppose I decide to review a package submission. I assign the > review bug to myself. The review turns up some problems that need to > be fixed. The person submitting the package doesn't respond for a > long time. Now what? Do I mark the bug NEEDINFO? What if the > submitter still doesn't respond? (I've got several bugs assigned to > me that are currently in this state.) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews kevin > Thanks,
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
