Re: Breaking deps deliberately

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:49:59PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> "* The distribution SHOULD not contain any broken EVR paths (i.e.
> packages that RPM considers "older" than those in the previous release).
> * The distribution SHOULD not contain any broken dependencies."
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/ReleaseCriteria#Package_Sanity

Yeah, that's not a packaging guideline though is it.  That's a set of
release criteria that the QA team use.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows
programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux