this is a non produtive discussion Richard is doing the best for fedora. On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 May 2009, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> >> Sounds like a sensible guideline? >> >>> and I think we need to ask if your provenpackager status should be >>> re-evaluated. >> >> For what? Breaking a non-existant guideline in order to help people >> who kept asking me for Fedora 10 support for libguestfs? Maybe we >> should 'discipline' people for breaking other unwritten rules too, >> such as adding packages to Fedora when sitting in bed or not correctly >> dressed. >> > > I think it is implicit within the definition of 'provenpackager' that you > understand the basic rules of how the system works. > > You couldn't be a 'provenphysicist' for example without understanding the > laws of thermodynamics. > > -sv > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- ------------ Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn: itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx sip: itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 +55 34 3221 8599 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
