Re: FESco meeting summary for 20090507

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Katz (katzj@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> On Sunday, May 10 2009, Jon Stanley said:
> > Moreover, with the new architecture support feature in F11, we're now
> > supposedly defaulting to an x86_64 kernel on an i686 install if the
> > processor supports it (note that I say supposedly because I've not
> > personally tested it).  Thus you have an x86_64 kernel, and all of the
> > goodness that brings, but you still have an i686 userspace.
> 
> Due to some complications, we fell back to the contingency and aren't
> installing the x86_64 kernel on the 32bit distro at all for F11 quite a
> while ago[1]

To elaborate:

- yum uses the running architecture to determine $basearch to use in
  your repo files
- Hence, installing an x86_64 kernel means yum immediately switches
  you to the x86_64 repo. Oops.

Also, you'd need one of:

- rpm code to allow installing x86_64 kernels when the host arch was x86
  *OR*
- syslinux/grub code for automatically picking the right kernel, and
  anaconda changes to ship both on the image


While we did create some patches, fixing this in a way that simultaneously:

- didn't require changes to existing repo files
- wasn't extremely gross

is non-trivial.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux