On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 16:18 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: >> In the desktop context packages get upgraded when PackageKit notices >> new stuff and the user starts downloading it. What was originally on >> the CD is mostly irrelevant. > > Except when you can't actually get to the desktop or use the update tool > because it's the F10 version that doesn't work with the rest of the F11 > content. If you've waited a while and have newer F10 packages than > what's on the F11 media you'll have a system in a fragile undefined > state. Ahh...I'm confused. How do you get to this state? It sounds like something preupgrade could handle in any case. Let me take a step back - here's all I'm trying to say: The user experience of the live images is way better than anaconda-the-OS, and we should be sure users who don't explicitly want a choose-your-own-adventure are getting the live images. Especially from things like trade shows. > How is the "minimal image" not a choose your own adventure? The minimal image is a targeted product in the sense that it's intended for people to build higher-level products on, like virtual machine appliances and the like. We wouldn't expect people to take the minimal image and then try to convert it into a desktop workstation. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
