On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 23:01 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Sure, I know about this. It means getting a real person from rel-eng > involved. Why can't it be automated We're getting things in place where this could be automated. > and/or why can't builds happen > against packages in updates-testing? Because things in -testing go away or get replaced with something else. This can cause a problem if your package built against something in testing, then you pushed stable and the -testing package went away. This mirrors what happens in RHEL land where pending errata doesn't go into buildroots unless otherwise requested. We could toy with letting updates-testing builds go into buildroots, but we'd have to add a whole lot more logic to the push system that would prevent something from being pushed to -stable unless everything it built against is also being pushed to stable or has already been pushed. All it takes is code. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
