On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 10:38:14PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I don't see anything wrong with this, as you're getting somebody to test > > > it before you move it. The thing that bothered me was how many packages > > > were going straight into updates without passing -testing. > > > > Well, as you just pointed out yourself, F11 testing is nonfunctional as > > yet. But the bigger problem is that putting stuff into -testing seldom > > Actually I don't see any important reason why not make F11 testing > functional as soon as F11 is frozen in rawhide. That would have been the least confusing thing to do (assuming it was a feasible option to begin with). I *tried* to use -testing, but nothing happened so I went ahead and pushed to stable because I knew my package was fine and it'd been a couple weeks. Ray -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
