Re: glibc fork ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, den 07.05.2009, 17:05 +0200 schrieb Denis Leroy:
> http://www.eglibc.org/home
> 
> So are we moving to eglibc as well ? :-)
> 
> So what happened ? Overreaction from Debian guy, or poor community 
> management from RH guy ?

I've discussed this issue with some debian maintainers I work with. It
seems they all agree to UD not being a very comfortable upstream
maintainer.

The question is: What kind of thing does eglibc worse than glibc?
I mean it is smaller and compatible so there must be regressions, right?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux