Bruno Wolff III (bruno@xxxxxxxx) said: > On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 08:56:36 -0700, > Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I honestly hadn't planned on doing regular snapshots during this period. > > Instead I was hoping for some test-days to drive the need for live > > images and/or full media images for a particular test target. For > > people looking for a good "jumping off" point, they can install the GA > > of F11 and yum update to rawhide. > > One thing that would help compensate for no alpha, is having usable boot.iso > images almost allt of the time. The last couple rawhides there have been > significant stretches when there were either no boot.iso images being produced > or the current ones weren't usable (or at least not for some types of > installs). > > I think there was talk at one time of keeping usable ones around for a while > in case of either failed or unusable builds. Generally¹, using the prior release's boot.iso and changing/editing the repos to point at rawhide should work reasonably well. Bill ¹: modulo rpm hash changes, etc. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
