On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 20:00 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Callum Lerwick wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 14:31 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > >> A person already makes a choice (a very big and "radical" one) when he > >> decides to use Linux. A second choice is made by deciding on Fedora. > >> Why should we enforce that these were the last choices he makes? > > > > http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog0000000059.html > > > > Nope, that text doesn't have any scientific value. It contains > variations of "Nobody cares", "Nobody wants..." without backup. I > neither have met this Nobody person, nor do I care what he wants more > than I care for any other user in the pool. In fact, I know more > people who care about certain design choices than who don't. Moreover, > the text tends to confuse bad design with customizability (although it > tries hard not to). I'm sure you have scientific studies showing people love playing 20 questions to get anything done, right?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
