On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think the primary problem here is numbers, not money. Of course, money >> would help getting the numbers up, but IMHO it isn't a goal by itself, just >> one of the ways to get there. > > > It was an example... my point is I don't think there is an > understanding of what sufficient means whether its people or bandwidth > or iron or kittens. So why not just declare that the KDE team is already sufficient and see where it goes? What harm could it cause? Seriously? /me wonders why bero left redhat to start ark linux... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list