Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> I'm having problems with igraph and python-igraph.
>>
>> igraph builds igraph-devel
>> python-igraph needs igraph-devel.
>>
>> I'm assuming python-igraph needs the same version of igraph.
>>
>> How should this be encoded?
>>
>> Right now, I have
>>
>> -------- igraph.spec
>> %package devel
>> Provides: %{name}-devel-%{version}
>
> You shouldn't need to explicitly do this, this comes automatically.
>
>> -------- python-igraph.spec
>>
>> BuildRequires: igraph-devel = %{version}
>
> This would require igraph-devel at the same version of python-igraph;
> that doesn't sound right to me since I guess these are separately
> released packages from uptream? (though they seem to have the same
> version in cvs...)
>
>> Is this correct?
>
> Doesn't seem quite correct to me.
>
> I'd drop the devel package Provides from the igraph spec (you should see
> that it still provides this anyway), and drop the version from the
> python-igraph BuildRequires unless these things really are in lockstep
> version release upstream, though that sounds odd since they seem to be
> two separate projects?
>
> If there -is- some minimum version for the build requires, you can hard
> code that in there. (BuildRequires: igraph-devel >= 0.5.2 or whatever)
>
> -Eric
>
Come from same source and really are lockstep. Thanks.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
