On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 21:16 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 05/01/2009 09:08 PM, Dimi Paun wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 08:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Change it to two hours and you'll be less frustrated. The report is: > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498041 > > > > Guys, this is a major usability issue -- it has become a pain > > to even read emails! This is a BLOCKER in my books, but bugzilla says: > > > > Priority: low Severity: medium (vote) > > > > This will hit everybody all the time -- how can it be a "nice to have"? > > Those fields are not used currently. Just ignore them. We use tracker > bugs to set something as a blocker, for Fedora 11, it is - F11Blocker. Right, for now the priority/severity fields are totally ignored. (I'm working on a proposal regarding that, you'll see a mail soon). The bug was set to block F11Blocker for a while, but Matthias disagreed and changed it to F11Target (which is the 'nice to have but we won't delay the release' tracker). Personally I disagree, but I'm not comfortable getting into a revision war with Matthias over it. Matthias, did you make that decision knowing that it's affecting a lot of people, on AC as well as battery power? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
