Matt Domsch wrote: > Some projects such as openSUSE do throw a lot of compute resources at > the problem, rebuilding all dependent packages in the chain when a > lower-level package is rebuilt. Fedora hasn't felt the need to go > quite this far. > > Between the FTBFS build runs that I do, and the mass rebuilds that the > Release Engineering team did for Fedora 11, and those that Jacob has > done when major gcc changes are about ready, nearly all (but not > exactly all) packages can be rebuilt as expected. The few (and it was > < 5% last time I looked, maybe significantly fewer even than that > after the F11 rebuilds) are quite problematic and mostly bit-rotten > code that people still have need for but upstream is stagnent. that's the problem. currently there're 7486 package in rawhide which means 5% ~= 375 package which is rather large number. imho these package should have to removed or fixed. and to avoid it at least create a new automatic bugzilla entry for these packages. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
