On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Carl D. Roth wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:36:20 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tuesday, April 28 2009, Carl D. Roth said:
I noticed this wierdness with rpm-4.6 (f10) and rpm-4.7 (f11)... When
I build packages including Python scripts, sometimes the .pyc and .pyo
files are included in the package manifest, and sometimes, they are
not.
[snip]
Why does the %__os_install_post macro vary in these examples? It's a
little frustrating, since a spec file that works outside of a mock
chroot may not work inside, and vice-versa.
Make sure you always have redhat-rpm-config installed
Jeremy
Since it appears to be necessary to build RPMs on a Fedora system, why
isn't there a dependency chain between redhat-rpm-config and rpm-build?
redhat-rpm-config defines RH/Fedora build policy/configuration. Rpm itself
doesn't give a damn where that configuration comes from and is fully
functional without it. It's just that rpm upstream build "policy" doesn't
match Fedora's.
- Panu -
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list