On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 09:22 -0700, Tom London wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 10:31 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > >> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 06:26 -0700, Tom London wrote: > >> > >> > My @home monitor does not support KMS; I'll retest with my "KMS > >> > approved" monitor @work. > >> > >> Can you clarify this statement? The monitor really shouldn't factor > >> into whether KMS works or not. Admittedly there's been some bugs with > >> the I2C code in the kernel (turns out KMS is the first serious user of > >> it, who knew), but X's mode selection logic is independent of who does > >> I2C. > > > > Also, what's the bug #? > > -- > BZ'ed here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489987 (filed > on "Intel Test Day").... Ah, that one. OK. I don't remember all bug reports, I track a lot. :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
