Florian La Roche (laroche@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > The issue here is that it's not *that* simple, once you > > start handling all the devices that aren't in sysfs. Moreover, > > it breaks the 'load module on device access' model. > > I thought this is more the exception and such devices should go into > a list of always available devices. It's not really the exception; it's the impetus behind kmod and module aliases in general. Bill
