Re: 2.6.29 kernel for f10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/27/2009 06:13 PM, M A Young wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Dennis J. wrote:

I guess I'm wondering why so much effort is put into this when by the
time the kernel gets released for f10 it is already outdated and we
are moving towards a f12 release which will end the support for f10
anyway.

If f10 and/or kernel 2.6.29 is going to be the baseline for RHEL 6
then I could see why such an effort is made but other than that, why
bother?

f10 has still 7 or 8 months to run. f9 is the version that will be
obsoleted soon, and that isn't being updated to 2.6.29. There is a good
chance that 2.6.30 will be out before f12 is released.

That's really my point. 2.6.30 will be out soon so 2.6.29 will be outdated again. What is the motivation of putting this much work into a kernel that will be outdated when released and only have a shelf-life of 7 or 8 months. Is there some critical feature in there that makes 2.6.29 so much better than 2.6.27 to warrant this much effort for so little gain?

Regards,
  Dennis


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux