Re: Request to become Provenpackager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:44:26 +0200
Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:20:57PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > 
> > My only question is: what do we do about dead reviews?
> 
> Maybe there should be a variant of
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews#Submitter_not_responding
> After the comment, the ticket should not closed, but the issue
> should be reported to FESCo who should force a co-maintainership
> or even reset ownership after a call on the devel mailing list
> (like an orphan process).

Yeah, we should figure out all the differences between regular requests
and merge reviews. For example: 

- Should make sure the current maintainer is cc'ed. 
- Should Look at open bugs on the package and see if any are packaging
  related and could be handled at the same time as the review. 
- Some procedure based on above about submitters not responding. 
etc.

> Pat

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux