On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:20:57 +0300 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 22:17 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:13:37PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > > > Making corrections to the spec file doesn't mean building the new > > > spec file, not to mention pushing the new build as an update. > > > That should be left to the maintainer, if at all possible. > > > > I think that you should only post patches, not commit to cvs, > > unless the package maintainer agreed to. > > Yes, this is of course the best option. > > My only question is: what do we do about dead reviews? Depends on what you mean by 'dead reviews'? If you mean a review where the maintainer isn't responding, perhaps we should look at following the unresponsive maintainer policy and/or asking them directly if they would like to hand off maintainership to someone else who has more time? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
